Tag Archives: old

Ageing population response

There has been much written about the UKs ageing population.  I am indebted to the Royal Geographical Society for this link. Please check it out.

In short, it summaries the challenges we face as the number of over 65s grows in volume, and over indexes as a percentage of the population as the birth rate drops.

I will not recreate all of that story here, please click the above link, it is a simple 60 second read on the 21st Century challenge of an ageing population.  It explains it far better than I can.

So why post if I think someone has already written so well on the topic? Well, I have seen a response, and I like it !

That sounds very grand, especially given I saw this response about 5 minutes walk from my home in Norfolk, and trust me it is very simple …

The East of England Co-op have created this value add service for their shoppers…

IMG_0167

It is so simple in fact, I am going to leave it to you to read the poster, rather than explain it.

It is available in my local convenience store, which sort of makes sense … as an ageing population drives less, the convenience store market will undoubtedly grow.  The nice thing for me is that it is a response from a smaller business.  I have yet to see similar tests from the bIg supermarkets.

The whole business is less than 200 stores and whilst you would expect this sort of member focused activity from a Co-op it still really demonstrates that they know their customers – there is no point adding these in a city centre store with footfall with an average age of under 25!

I work for a smaller business and one thing that I have noticed is that I have a more detailed understanding of what makes our members tick, you feel closer, you don’t rely on the big omnibus surveys and full-blown presentations.  You are inherently closer to your customers, and, if you have support from your Exec to test and learn, as I do, and like East of England Co-op clearly do, then it makes sense to try new things.  This is a great response, I for one hope it works well for them.

Paul
10 June 2015

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Positioning Manchester United

old-trafford-view-2

I will declare my colours early, I prefer Rugby League to football.

I will declare that my football supporting is entirely devoted to the finest team in Europe – Derby County, and that I harbour a grudge from the 8th December 2007 when Derby lost to Man United
4-1. We scored our first away goal of the season, but still a blatant dive won them a penalty to add the 4th in the 90th minute.  Just my opinion you understand ! You can check it out here

But this is a marketing blog and my concern is the proposition and positioning of Manchester United. I worked in Manchester for 8 years and the company I worked for had a box at Old Trafford, so I went quite a few times.

Its a fabulous Ground, a bit light on singing perhaps, but it’s a truly great stadium and the support is genuinely European, at the 4-1 defeat I sat next to a Dane and German – I was in the Stretford end, not being able to get a ticket for the Derby end, which I have to say was interesting for me when Derby scored and my enthusiasm brimmed over a little. The guys around me were nice to me … firm you understand, but nice nonetheless!

When at Old Trafford though you do get a sense of the club being different. Its focus on the heritage story, the remembrance of the Munich disaster is touching but not overdone, the heritage play is impressive as is the use of their ‘Legends’.

The club positions itself as different, their charter is explicit about this not just being a ‘playing ethos’: The mission statement is simple “To be the best football club in the world, both on and off the pitch”.

Simple?

It goes on to state in its CRS policy that it wants to tackle social issues regionally, nationally and internationally.

The reach they have is incredible – see the graphics here to see what I mean.  They can do it I would contend !

They position themselves as doing things differently, but did they/do they?  What is the evidence?

  1. The Class of 92 evidences a continued desire to ‘grow their own’ … and keep them as can be seen by the current coaching set-up.
  2. The Legends – Bobby Charlton was loved by the British public and is a fabulous Ambassador for MUFC
  3. Sir Alex Ferguson was an incredibly long serving manager at 26 years, having had a difficult first few years he built and rebuilt the team. (My explicit contention being that MUFC did not afford David Moyes the same level of support). He was given time to establish his approach and was famously only one game away from the sack, allegedly. when they won the FA Cup in 1990.
  4. They have a track record of keeping players like Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes for long periods of time – both were still playing in their 40s. They do buy in the open market naturally, but they do farm their own fields particularly well. The latest being Tom Cleverly I guess.  The interesting thought is that given the reach described above – blending home grown with worldwide talent ticks boxes in the UK and around the world – vital in todays international game … and for the MUFC mission statement to be believeable
  5. They innovate too – from using basketball training techniques on jumping for headers to yoga and Pilates and early forays into GPS tracking of plays during games (2010).

The ethos has been to do things differently ever since those days of 100,000 supporters at every game in the 1950s. For example Bobby Charlton was asked to work in a factory whilst an apprentice to make sure he understood what it/MUFC meant to ‘real supporters’.  The tragedy of Munich positioned the team and the Busby Babes uniquely in Britain in the still austere post war years … and who didn’t like George Best in the 60’s?

Their positioning was, yes was, all about not doing the normal football things like not hiring and firing Managers after short periods in charge.

To do things with class and dignity.

That has been evident in how the Club has responded to the ongoing criticism of its owners the Glazer family, where Sir Alex Ferguson has been vocally supportive of the regime, but perhaps not in how they handled the sacking of David Moyes.

The 49 million people who regularly watch Man United play each week around the world will possibly be conflicted by the recent events, they will have their own views on who they want to manage the club (don’t we all?) but will the manner of its handling make a change in perception … will the club museum be visited less, or stories of the legends, and doing things the Man United way, be viewed with more scepticsm now? I think they may … at least until the next trophy.

Moyes, was dignified in his exit but the League Managers Association has accused MUFC of acting in an unprofessional manner.

The reporting has been so extensive around the sacking of Moyes that this will inevitably have landed. The master stroke may well be making Ryan Giggs the interim Manger, but not, I would contend, if any new manager dispenses with his services when appointed.

Aside from Arsene Wenger at Arsenal only 2 other managers have been in charge for more than 2 seasons in the current premier league. MUFC and Arsenal standing out as being very different.

It is an interesting dilemma for MUFC, do they acknowledge failings in how the story leaked out and try and endear themselves to fans once more? or not?

I think this is where sports club brands are different to other business brands. The passion and often delusional faith that sports fans have is very different, I will forgive Workington Town RLFC virtually any indiscretion, they are my team, I follow them through thick and thin. If ticket prices go up, I assume this is to allow investment in the club, if facilities are reduced I assume this is to enable monies to be spent on the team and so on. Its irrational not rational.

MUFC will undoubtedly weather this storm but you do feel they will need to demonstrate their difference all over again if they are not to be linked with the usual managerial merry-go round and perceived lack of ‘ethics’ in the game.

Success on the pitch will be the defining factor I imagine, for the fans at least. For Marketers its an interesting propositional challenge to see if they are now viewed just like all other football clubs where Managers are accountable in a more direct way for performance failure than virtually any other business.

I would love your comments … especially on that 2007 penalty !

Paul

28th April 2014

Acknowledgements:

Indie for photo
Telegraph and twitter for the reach stats
Forbes for the Bobby Charlton factory information

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Getting old

I am getting older, I know this because:

I have moved up a research segmentation category.

I am losing my hair … ok I have largely lost it.

I find myself looking nostalgically at my vinyl collection now I’m moving house – I have no turntable!

I still buy a hard copy of the Guardian.

I still use my old fashion drip coffee machine it only cost about five pounds some 15 years ago.

I still buy magazines … and I keep them .. Ok its Art Review and Creative Review mainly, not TrainWorld or Wood Turner Weekly.  Just saying.

But surprisingly the most noticeable change is my embracing of a less tolerant view of the permissive society.  I have to say, given I collect Tracy Emin, that this is restricted to advertising only though !

First it was the Confused.com advert I posted about.  Whoever thought dogging (sorry shoe lace tying) would make it onto a motor insurance ad.  Not me for sure.

Check out my post for all the gory details.

Second it was Flora

This is really a tad disturbing … ok, I am not a prude, but softening sex references by use of a cartoon is a little weird – especially given the endearing childlike voiceover and pronunciation of anniversary.  At 18s in, the ad descends into knowingness.  The older child clearly knows that they are not wrestling – otherwise why cover his siblings eyes.

I find it distasteful, but more importantly disconnected to the insight – the wholesome anniversary breakfast is a good insight, the awful combinations children serve is heart warming and long remembered.  This ad sullies that image, and will not I expect be long remembered as a good ad.

For the brand – it adds nothing in my view, unless they were seeking to court controversy and feel being talked about as being ‘edgy’ is a good tactic to grow awareness.

I was grumbling to myself the other day (see – I told you I was getting old) having seen that Flora ad again, when the new Foxes ad appeared … I loved these early ads with Vinnie the Panda.

They were fresh and entertaining.

It was a fine brand spokesperson, friendly, but iconic and with standout.

Now in this latest ad .. It borders on a degree of threat.  The end line is tipping over the boundary I think … for a brand icon to end with threats is odd, in terms of adding ‘edge’ to the brand, it probably works, but its a biscuit ad … edge is not required, maybe it’s stand-out they were after.  I have no idea what customer insight it is based on.

So I either need to get out more, or reassess my boundaries.

So I have a plan.

I intend to immerse myself in alternating Hannah Montana videos and the Miley Cyrus video of ‘Wrecking ball’ to effect this change … wish me luck ! See you on the other side !

Paul

27 October 2013

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,