Trust and Financial services. Just 4 words but the amount of time this occupies in creative agencies and Banks and Insurers currently is incredible.
I have posted on my blogs about trust, heritage and credibility alongside customer insight regularly in the last few months.
The amount of money being spent on TV advertising alone is now significant in trying to rebuild trust in Banks and banking. Some even use the word in the advertising. A risky approach , who amongst us thinks, “trust me I’m a doctor is reassurring”?
Lets look at the cold hard facts, these stats are a little dated, March 2010 … so the numbers are only likely to have increased;
Selected UK Payment Volumes and Values Annually
|Volume (billions)||Value (£ billions)|
|Value transported by G4S, Loomis, etc||around 700|
* Including internet and telephone banking: Source UK Payments Council – the Future for cash in the UK report
In essence we trust our banks to do all of this every single day. We trust that when we set up a direct debit that it will be paid as we instruct, the same with standing orders, the same when we go to the cash machine to draw out cash.
So on an unconscious level we do trust our Banks and Financial Services companies. We even trust brand new companies to do this … look at the success of Metro Bank – a start up!. And what convinces us to change our Bank … well I know switching is low currently – only around 2.5% to 5% according to the latest Payments Council report and Simon -Kucher research, but the reports show that 37% of us would CONSIDER switching to a challenger Bank. Now I know that there is a difference between words and actions, otherwise the switching figure would be much higher, so maybe the trust issue is a lack of trust in the banks to switch our current accounts correctly.
That is a very different starting point and all the brand rhetoric in the world will not convince people this is low risk, unless there are some hard facts/proof points behind your claims.
To try to resolve that the Payments Council have now announced details of the switching guarantee scheme – a real positive forward-looking move. I won’t repeat all the details but at launch in September 2013 almost 100% of Banks are included and in summary the details are:
- The service is free to use
- The customer can choose and agree the switch date with their new current account provider
- The new current account provider will take care of moving all payments going out (e.g Direct Debits) and those coming in (e.g. salary)
- For 13 months the new current account provider will arrange for payments accidentally made to the old account to be automatically redirected to the new account
- If anything goes wrong with the switch, as soon as it is told the new current account provider will refund any interest and charges made on either a customer’s old or new current account as a result of the failure.
You can read the full details here.
Nationwide have the most interesting publicly stated approach to service driving loyalty which works well as a compliment to the above hard / rational approach. In Marketing Week Magazine (2 May 2013) their Customer Strategy Director stated that “…we treat our existing customers, if not the same, then better than new customers…” interesting. Santander are using their 123 offer to rationally drive loyalty by giving tangible benefits to loyal customers of its current account offering. Interesting.
It’s a fierce marketplace that generates lots of marketing activity and expenditure. A simple fact I know, and you can trust me here (sic), as you will see this offer repeatedly, is that at present it only takes £100 to ‘incentivise (read “bribe”)’ someone to switch current account providers. I’ve marketed on that basis successfully in the very recent past.
So do I think trust is key? No I don’t, not entirely.
I think you need to be ‘liked’ by your customers and your target market. Here is an example; First Direct are loved by their customers
Look at this Which survey from November 2012.
|Customer satisfaction for current accounts|
|Current accounts||Internet||Telephone||Customer score|
|The Co-Operative Bank||87%|
|The One Account||n/a||n/a||85%|
|Intelligent Finance (IF)||64%|
I would contend that the platypus campaign is an advertising strategy designed to make you LIKE the brand not TRUST the brand.
Likeability is a much underrated virtue and one that is, obviously tied up in trust, but its more complex, it plays into multiple dimensions of the emotional and rational belief in a brand.
I wonder if the customer engagement cycle now looks like this:
AWARENESS —> LIKING —> CONSIDERATION —> PURCHASE —> ENGAGED LOYALTY/ADDITIONAL PURCHASE THROUGH EXPERIENCE AND USAGE —> RETAIN
I think that in designing strategies for success in 2013 the banks that will win will demonstrate the following:
- leveraging the unconscious trust – perhaps through reminding customers of what they do day in day out
- developing a friendly empathetic approach to service and acquisition to drive likeability
- Become more likeable in their public image – advertising and what they are famous for – I await the rise of Sponsorship here !
- A customer experience that holds at its core, that a customer who does not like you, even if they stay, will not repeat buy and will be a vocal pagan
- A brand that really champions the switch guarantee service – publicly and often … this will build trust, trust that the brand has its processes nailed already. Early adoption will be crucial.
I would really welcome your views .. let me know what you think if you get a minute or two, thanks.
17 06 2013